I want to say it once again:
As we hold those question hours to follow the NL 7-1 Gov't Question Hour Act and as Chancellor, the RA and the SC are supposed to chair those meetings as representatives of our government those meetings can not be seen any different than official and open for all to get informed about pending CDS matters.
A meeting required by law is a proceeding and you can read in the Constitution both RA and SC both have to keep and publish a journal of their proceedings. (Section 5 - Journal)
We all want our government to be as transparent as possible and holding back transcripts of official meetings would be extremely counterproductive.
I fully understand one might want to ask questions or make statements about sensitive topics. But if one does not want to see them published the official gov´t question hour might not be the right place for them.
In my opinion we need both: the official question hour as an informal and educative event and also more semi private gatherings so new or less active citizens get a chance to met the representatives of their government in a more relaxed and private setting.
Now that we are about to reduce the official question hours to one per month I plan to invite citizens to less formal brunches more often and highly encourage my fellow government members to do the same.